Tom Krattenmaker
Who said people can't be moral without
religion?
STORY
HIGHLIGHTS
· When will the Boy
Scout accept the nonreligious? · Undergirding the Boy
Scouts' ban is the dubious premise that people cannot be moral without
religion. ·
It's the right thing to do.
Depending on what happens at the Boy Scouts' national meeting this month,gay Scouts might soon be accepted into the venerable organisation. Even then, there will remain a large and growing group of Americans still barred by the Boy Scouts.
When will the Boy Scouts accept the
non-religious?
The Boy Scouts of America recognizes an
impressive range of religious affiliations that qualify one as
"reverent" and, thus, eligible to participate. Two dozen varieties of Christianity get
the nod, plus Zoroastrianism, Judaism, Hinduism, Islam, Bahai'ism and more.
However, the non-religious are not welcome, and that poses a problem the Boy
Scouts should address in addition to the sexual orientation question drawing so
much attention.
Undergirding the Boy Scouts' ban is the
dubious premise that people cannot be moral without religious belief. It's an
assumption that non-believers are wisely challenging as the public face of
atheism moves away from angry anti-religious diatribes, typified by the late Christopher Hitchens,
toward a positive expression of non-belief summed up by the pithy phrase "good without god."
Can atheists be good Scouts? Neil Polzin's story suggests a
resounding "yes." Polzin, now 29, contributed to a successful
life-and-death rescue operation during a Boy Scouts backpacking trip when he
was 13. He later became an Eagle Scout and an aquatics program director as an
adult. In 2009, as he tells it, a rival who wanted his job made an issue of the
fact that Polzin is an atheist. Hoping to clear the air, Polzin notified his
regional council of his atheism — and was unceremoniously booted.
One would think that his long track
record would have proved his skill and moral worthiness by that point. But all
the years of good Scouting and service were
erased by a single dreaded word: atheist.
Margaret Downy, president of the Freethought Society (and the mother of the a young man who was barred from
the Scouts as a boy), is leveraging the new focus on Boy Scout inclusion
policies to prompt a fresh look at its ban on atheists. Downey welcomes the new
momentum for inclusion of gay Scouts. Even so, she asks, why no consideration
of non-believing boys, too? "There is no question that people can be good
without a god belief," Downey says. The Boy Scouts offer a great program,
she adds, "yet their bigoted membership policies are harmful."
Welcoming non-believers might seem a
difficult bridge to cross for the Boy Scouts and traditionalists who defend
current membership requirements. Wouldn't acceptance of atheists force
revisions to the Boy Scout Oath, which pledges duty to god and country? Why should a private,
voluntary organization have to do that, particularly when most Scout troops are chartered by churches?
These and other obstacles can be
navigated through nuance, common sense and mutual respect. Let the churches
that charter Scout troops adopt the attitude that churches usually adopt when
it comes to non-believers: Welcome them in the hope of having a positive influence
on them. Require atheist Scouts to respect the religion of their fellow Scouts,
leaders and sponsors, with the assurance that their non-belief will be
respected in kind. And, as Downey suggests, an additional "o" can go
a long way; let the atheist Scout pledge his devotion to "good"
rather than "God."
Ultimately, it would be self-defeating
for the Boy Scouts to forfeit the chance to spread Scouting skills and values
among the population of people who identify as atheist, agnostic, or otherwise
not religious. More and more youths are growing up in non-religious homes; why
would the organization squander the opportunity to serve and influence these
boys?
Yes, as a private association, the Boy
Scouts have a right to decide for themselves who's in and who's out. But just
because they can exclude atheists doesn't mean they should.
"There are millions of young,
secular Americans committed to civic duty, community service and personal
improvement," says August Brunsman, executive director of the Secular
Student Alliance. "They're looking to serve their country alongside their
religious friends, and it's long past time for the Boy Scouts to wake up and
let these admirable young men serve."
It's the right thing to do. And here's
the bonus: Once the Boy Scouts open up to non-believers, they're going to
discover they have a lot to contribute — just as they've been contributing all
along.
Tom Krattenmaker is a member of USA TODAY's Board of
Contributors and author of the new book The
Evangelicals You Don't Know.
No comments:
Post a Comment